eimeria prevention by hipra logo transparent background
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Blog
  • Videos
  • Library
  • Calculators
  • FAQ’s
Menu
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Blog
  • Videos
  • Library
  • Calculators
  • FAQ’s
Search
Close

Is Eimeria tenella the only species diagnosed in poultry coccidiosis?

  • October 25, 2018
Share on TwitterShare on Linkedin

On several occasions in this blog, we have talked about coccidiosis diagnosis, and we recently focused on the lesion scoring technique, which is certainly the most widely used method for diagnosing Eimeria tenella in the field. Let us carry out a brief review of all the posts published on this subject with a view to understanding how to make the most of each technique. 

Oocyst counts & morphological evaluation

Oocysts per gram of faeces (OPG) count and morphological identification are often wrongfully considered the gold standard technique for coccidiosis diagnosis.

Wrongfully because the presence of oocysts cannot be interpreted as an outbreak of coccidiosis, as Eimeria oocysts are ubiquitous.

Therefore, the significance of this finding must be weighed against the level of oocysts/gram first and then other indicators of disease, such as the presence of clinical signs in live animals, as well as macro- and microscopic lesions in the intestine at necropsy.

OPG and morphometry are very useful when performed regularly (e.g. once per week) to follow up and monitor either the development of resistance of Eimeria field strains to anticoccidials (if this is the prevention strategy used in the tested house) or, after coccidiosis vaccination, to check the vaccination technique and the onset of immunity in the flock.

Being able to identify species like Eimeria acervulina, E. maxima and E. tenella in field samples using morphometry is relatively important, as we are able to diagnose these three species at an earlier stage on the basis of lesion scoring in the gut.

On the other hand, it is extremely important to be able to identify E. praecox and E. mitis, as these two species do not produce pathognomonic gross lesions, but are still able to cause subclinical coccidiosis (Williams et al. 2009).

Key points for counting oocysts and oocyst identification are correct homogenization of the sample before processing, weighing accuracy, use of the correct dilution factor and a microscopic observation method without artefacts.

With regard to the latter, samples need to be preserved in good condition: the shape of oocysts can be altered if the oocyst ages or sporulates over time, particularly when the temperature and humidity are favourable.

To avoid this, it is very important for samples to be kept under refrigeration until analysed. In this way, maturation is prevented and the number of atypical forms is reduced.

As shown in the image above, an optical microscope and a McMaster chamber is needed for performing oocyst per gram (OPG) counts.

PCR for Eimeria identification

Nowadays, with real-time PCR, it is possible to achieve accurate identification of the Eimeria species present in the sample as well as the quantity of each species (Nolan 2015), which is, for example, very useful for confirmation of diagnosis after the observation of typical gross lesions of E. tenella in the caeca, but it is vital to check for the presence of E. praecox and E. mitis, as already mentioned.

However, DNA-based methods such as PCR are used mostly to complete both OPG and morphological evaluation, especially in follow-up protocols after vaccination or when prevalence studies are conducted, but (as mentioned with regard to the aforementioned techniques), it loses its diagnostic value if not supported by clinical history, time of infection and signs and lesions observed.

Anyway, it is true that PCR overcomes some of the limitations of conventional methods, enabling more samples to be analysed in less time, increasing sensitivity, allowing qualitative and quantitative results in one step and even serving as a method to guarantee the identity and purity of strains present in vaccines (You 2014).

PCR along with OPG, morphological species identification and clinical judgement provides improved coccidiosis diagnosis based on a comprehensive approach.

Lesion scoring

In previous posts we have alreay explained what the main 3 key points for success in lesion scoring during a flock inspection using the Johnson & Reid (1970) method: selection of birds, necropsy procedure and training in lesion identification.

In addition, we know from the biological cycle of Eimeria that birds with lesions do not yet shed oocysts.

Schizogony (the asexual replication of the parasite that leads to gut damage) constitutes the first stage of replication of the parasite and it is only after two or three rounds of asexual reproduction and sexual replication (or gamogony) that formation of immature oocysts occurs, these being excreted in the external environment together with faeces.

The entire Eimeria cycle usually takes 4-7 days depending on the species. This said, it is easy to understand why lesion scoring probably still represents the quickest way of diagnosing avian coccidiosis, and the way that allows diagnosis at the earliest stage, for at least those Eimeria spp. with pathognomonic lesions, such as Eimeria acervulina, E. brunetti, E. maxima, E. necatrix and E. tenella.

In conclusion, for a conclusive diagnosis of avian coccidiosis and precise information about which Eimeria spp. are involved, it is vital to use a diagnostic laboratory that is able to run, and has the skills to complement, all three of the aforementioned techniques. Because it is not just Eimeria tenella that causes avian coccidiosis.

 

References

Johnson J., Reid W.M., 1970. Anticoccidial drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp. Parasitology 28(1): 30-6.

Nolan M.J., Tomley F.M., Kaiser P., Blake D.P., 2015. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for Eimeria tenella replication — Implications for experimental refinement and animal welfare. Parasitology International 64 (5):464-470.

Williams R.B., Marshall R.N., Pagès M., Dardi M., Del Cacho E., 2009. Pathogenesis of Eimeria praecox in chickens: virulence of field strains compared with laboratory strains of E. praecox and Eimeria acervulina. Avian Pathology 38(5), 359-366.

You M.J., 2014. Detection of four important Eimeria species by multiplex PCR in a single assay. Parasitology International 63 (3):527-32.

 

Previous Post

What should we ask of a vaccine against Eimeria?

Next Post

Coccidiosis in chickens is a gut health issue: looking for a beneficial combination of vaccines & probiotics (Part II)

Related Posts

Taking advantage of qPCR when a coccidiosis vaccine for chickens is used

Taking advantage of qPCR when a coccidiosis vaccine for chickens is used

29 January, 2021

There is a large number of species of the Eimeria parasite that cause coccidiosis disease, both in birds of the...

Uniformity as a key concept when talking about coccidiosis in chickens

Uniformity as a key concept when talking about coccidiosis in chickens

23 December, 2020

In poultry production, there are multiple zootechnical parameters that are constantly evaluated in order to ensure that the full productive...

Blog Categories

  • Coccidiosis in Chickens
  • Coccidiosis prevention
  • Coccidiosis Treatment
  • Eimeria
  • Eimeria Tenella
  • Oocyst
  • Symptoms of Coccidiosis in Chickens
NEWSLETTER
DON'T MISS ANY UPDATES

I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy and Basic information on Data Protection

Library

Check latests documents

Calculator

Tools to prevent Eimeria

FAQ's

Facts you should know

Next Post
timetable of mortality in broilers per day post-vaccination

Coccidiosis in chickens is a gut health issue: looking for a beneficial combination of vaccines & probiotics (Part II)

eimeria prevention by hipra logo transparent background

Categories

  • Coccidiosis in Chickens
  • Coccidiosis Treatment
  • Eimeria
  • Eimeria Tenella
  • Oocyst

Pages

  • Blog
  • Videos
  • Library
  • Calculators
  • FAQ’s

hipra

HIPRA 2021 All rights reserved

  • COOKIES POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
Menu
  • COOKIES POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
Basic Personal Data Protection information:

Controller: LABORATORIOS HIPRA, S.A.
Purposes: Managing the contractual and/or business relationship with HIPRA, including sending news, promotions and invitations to events sponsored by HIPRA.
Lawful basis: Performance of the contractual relationship and HIPRA's legitimate Interest.
Recipients: Third parties to which HIPRA has entrusted cloud computing, security, auditing, mailing, technical and computer support services, as well as companies in its group.
Rights: Request access to and rectification or erasure of personal data and other rights as explained in the additional information. You can seeview the detailed additional information about data protection in our Privacy Policy.

For further information, please check our detailed information on Data Protection.
close-link
NEWSLETTER
DON'T MISS ANY UPDATES
Basic Personal Data Protection information:
Controller: LABORATORIOS HIPRA, S.A.
Purposes: Managing the contractual and/or business relationship with HIPRA, including sending news, promotions and invitations to events sponsored by HIPRA.
Lawful basis: Performance of the contractual relationship and HIPRA's legitimate Interest.Recipients: Third parties to which HIPRA has entrusted cloud computing, security, auditing, mailing, technical and computer support services, as well as companies in its group.
Rights: Request access to and rectification or erasure of personal data and other rights as explained in the additional information. You can seeview the detailed additional information about data protection in our Privacy Policy.

For further information, please check our detailed information on Data Protection.
I have read and agree to the Privacy Policy and Basic information on Data Protection.
cross icon to banners and popup
This website uses its own cookies and those of third parties to improve our services and navigation. By clicking on Accept you consent our use of all these cookies. You can also opt to change your settings. For more information, see our cookie policy. Read More

ACCEPT ALL COOKIES Cookie settings
Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
Domain: .eimeriaprevention.com
Description: This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category ''Necessary''.
Duration: 1 years 1 days 1 hours
Type: Necessary

__cfduid
Domain: .freegeoip.live
Description: The cookie is used by cdn services like CloudFare to identify individual clients behind a shared IP address and apply security settings on a per-client basis. It does not correspond to any user ID in the web application and does not store any personally identifiable information.
Duration: 1 years 30 days
Type: Necessary

cookielawinfo-checkbox-non-necessary
Domain: eimeriaprevention.com
Description: This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category ''Non-necessary''.br /> Duration: 1 years 19 days 15 hours 19 minutes
Type: Necessary

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

_ga
Domain: .eimeriaprevention.com
Description: This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site''s analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
Duration: 1 years 20 days 8 hours 50 minutes
Type: Analytics

_gid
Domain: eimeriaprevention.com
Description: This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
Duration: 1 years 19 days 15 hours 21 minutes
Type: Analytics

_gat
Domain: eimeriaprevention.com
Description: This cookies is installed by Google Universal Analytics to throttle the request rate to limit the colllection of data on high traffic sites.
Duration: 1 years 19 days 15 hours 19 minutes
Type: Performance

Website for veterinarians

The contents of this website are aimed exclusively at prescribing veterinarians. By clicking on ACCEPT you state that you are a veterinary professional. In other case, please contact a veterinarian and click on DECLINE.

Accept
Decline